Ethereum and Solana followed distinct architectural paths as blockchain usage expanded beyond simple transfers. Ethereum prioritized programmability and composability, while Solana optimized for throughput and latency. Both approaches lowered friction for payments, though in different ways. Bitcoin followed a separate trajectory. Its base layer remained focused on security and settlement, leaving payment experimentation to layered systems. Bitcoin Everlight is being developed within this context, concentrating specifically on payment flow and confirmation behavior without altering Bitcoin’s core design. Ethereum’s Way: Programmability and Layered Payments Ethereum established itself as a general-purpose execution environment. Smart contracts enabled decentralized finance, stablecoins, and application-level payments to operate directly on-chain. As usage increased, Ethereum adopted a modular scaling model. The base layer provides security and decentralization, while Layer 2 rollups handle execution-intensive activity. Networks such as Arbitrum and Optimism process thousands of transactions per second with fees often measured in cents. This structure supports high payment volume, particularly for stablecoins and institutional settlement, while preserving Ethereum’s security assumptions. Solana’s Path: Throughput and Latency Optimization Solana optimized its architecture for speed and low cost. Its monolithic design processes execution, consensus, and data availability in a single layer, enabling high throughput and low latency. By early 2026, Solana achieves transaction finality measured in hundreds of milliseconds following protocol upgrades such as Alpenglow. Average transaction costs remain fractions of a cent. These characteristics have driven adoption in consumer-facing applications, gaming, and payment pilots, including stablecoin settlement experiments involving Visa. Solana’s payment usability is closely tied to its performance profile. Bitcoin’s Different Starting Point Bitcoin was designed for secure settlement and predictable issuance. Its base layer processes a limited number of transactions per second, with block intervals averaging ten minutes. This structure supports decentralization and censorship resistance while constraining retail payment throughput. Layered systems such as the Lightning Network expanded Bitcoin’s payment capabilities by moving activity off-chain. These systems support fast, low-cost transfers, though they introduce operational considerations around liquidity and routing. Bitcoin’s payment evolution has therefore occurred around the base layer, not within it. How Bitcoin Everlight Approaches Payments Bitcoin Everlight focuses directly on payment routing and confirmation while operating alongside Bitcoin. It does not modify Bitcoin’s protocol, consensus rules, or monetary properties. Bitcoin remains the settlement layer. Everlight processes transactions through a dedicated node network instead of Bitcoin full nodes. Confirmation relies on quorum-based validation, producing confirmations in seconds. Transaction batches can optionally be anchored back to Bitcoin, preserving a verifiable settlement reference while limiting continuous base-layer interaction. This design targets payment flow within Bitcoin’s constraints through routing discipline and predictable micro-fees. Node operators stake BTCL tokens to participate in routing and lightweight validation. Performance is measured through uptime coefficients and routing metrics covering latency, confirmation success, and sustained throughput. Routing priority adjusts with consistent performance, and a fixed 14-day lock period supports predictable participation during early deployment. Bitcoin Everlight has completed third-party reviews covering protocol integrity and operational accountability. Smart contract logic and system components have been examined through the SpyWolf Audit and the SolidProof Audit . Team identity verification has been completed through SpyWolf KYC Verification and Vital Block KYC Validation , establishing identifiable accountability behind development and operational control. Payment Network Comparison in 2026 Feature Ethereum (L1 + L2) Solana Bitcoin Everlight Core Focus Smart contracts and composability Speed and low latency Payment routing on Bitcoin Typical Throughput ~15–20 TPS (L1); thousands on L2 ~600–700 TPS Dependent on node routing Transaction Finality ~12s (L1); near-instant on L2 Sub-second Seconds (quorum-based) Average Fee ~$0.00025 Predictable micro-fees Settlement Anchor Ethereum Solana Bitcoin Base Protocol Changes Ongoing Ongoing None This comparison highlights how each network optimizes a different layer of the payment stack. Market Attention and Early BTCL Distribution BTCL has a fixed total supply of 21,000,000,000 tokens. 45% is allocated to a public presale structured across 20 stages. The presale is currently in Stage 2, with a token price of $0.0010, advancing toward a final stage price of $0.0110. Distribution includes 20% unlocked at the token generation event and 80% released linearly over six to nine months, with remaining allocations assigned to node rewards, liquidity, team vesting, and ecosystem development. Independent technical discussion has examined Everlight’s payment model. In a recent video, Crypto Infinity reviews the routing architecture, node participation structure, and confirmation flow under live conditions. Enter the Bitcoin Everlight presale and acquire BTCL through the current access window. Website: https://bitcoineverlight.com/ Security: https://bitcoineverlight.com/security How to Buy: https://bitcoineverlight.com/articles/how-to-buy-bitcoin-everlight-btcl
